Adjacent framework · BCM-relevant controls

The NCA ECC framework and its resilience controls

The Saudi National Cybersecurity Authority’s Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC-2:2024) — four domains, 108 main controls. BCMStack covers the Cybersecurity Resilience domain natively. We don’t pretend to cover the rest; we link to it.

Issued by
NCA Saudi Arabia
ECC-2:2024
4 domains · 108 controls
BCMStack covers
Resilience domain natively

Honest scope of NCA ECC coverage

BCMStack is a Business Continuity Management platform, not a cybersecurity platform. We cover the NCA ECC controls that intersect with BCM — primarily the Cybersecurity Resilience domain. For Cybersecurity Defense (network, endpoint, IAM, vulnerability management) and most of the Governance and Third-Party and Cloud domains, you need dedicated security tooling. NCA ECC compliance for an in-scope organisation requires both — BCMStack alongside your security stack, not instead of it.

Need NCA ECC coverage across all four domains?

Vantage GRC — the broader governance, risk and compliance platform from the same team behind BCMStack — manages the Cybersecurity Governance, Cybersecurity Defense and Third-Party and Cloud domains at the GRC layer: policy register, control evidence, vendor risk, audit workflow. BCMStack handles the resilience side; Vantage GRC handles the rest. Many KSA organisations run both.

Explore Vantage GRC at grcvantage.com
On this page
§1 — Definition

What the NCA ECC framework is

The Essential Cybersecurity Controls (ECC) is the baseline cybersecurity framework published by Saudi Arabia’s National Cybersecurity Authority. First issued in 2018 and replaced by ECC-2:2024, it defines the minimum cybersecurity controls that in-scope Saudi organisations must implement.

Structurally, ECC-2:2024 is organised into four main domains, 28 subdomains, 108 main controls and 92 subcontrols. The 2024 version removed the former Industrial Control Systems domain, whose controls now sit in NCA’s Operational Technology Cybersecurity Controls (OTCC). Each control is detailed with implementation expectations, supporting references and assessment criteria. NCA performs supervisory reviews against the controls; findings flow into the NCA enforcement framework.

For a SAMA-regulated bank in Saudi Arabia that also qualifies as Critical National Infrastructure, NCA ECC sits alongside the SAMA BCM Framework and the SAMA Cybersecurity Framework. The three overlap on resilience and incident-response controls; smart institutions operate one BCMS and map evidence to all three regulators.

§2 — Scope

Who must comply

NCA ECC is mandatory for specific organisation categories and voluntary for others as a recognised KSA cybersecurity benchmark.

Saudi government bodies

All ministries, agencies, public-sector entities. Mandatory; non-compliance flagged in NCA supervisory reviews.

Critical National Infrastructure

Energy, telco, transport, healthcare, financial services where SAMA supervision overlaps. Mandatory once designated.

Sub-contractors to government

Suppliers handling government data or systems often required to demonstrate ECC alignment as a contractual condition.

Voluntary adopters

Private-sector organisations adopt ECC as a recognised KSA-specific cybersecurity benchmark, especially when bidding for government work.

§3 — Structure

The four domains of the ECC framework

Domain-by-domain coverage map. Native = BCMStack handles end-to-end · Partial = BCMStack covers BCM-adjacent controls only · Out of scope = needs dedicated security tooling.

Domain 1

Cybersecurity Governance

Strategy, policy, organisational structure, roles and responsibilities, risk management, compliance reporting.

BCMStack covers BCM-policy artefacts, RBAC, audit log, improvement actions. Broader cybersecurity governance lives in your security GRC.

Partial

Domain 2

Cybersecurity Defense

Network security, endpoint protection, identity and access management, vulnerability management, secure SDLC.

Not BCM territory. Use dedicated tooling — your SIEM, EDR, IAM, vulnerability scanner.

Out of scope

Domain 3

Cybersecurity Resilience

Subdomain 3-1, Cybersecurity Resilience Aspects of BCM: continuity of cybersecurity systems and procedures, response plans for cyber incidents that affect business continuity, and disaster recovery plans, all periodically reviewed.

This is BCMStack's home domain. BCP, BIA, Crisis, Exercise modules cover this end-to-end with native ISO 22301 alignment.

Native

Domain 4

Third-Party and Cloud Computing Cybersecurity

Third-party cybersecurity (vendor requirements, contracts, end-of-service obligations) and cloud computing and hosting cybersecurity.

BCMStack tracks vendors as BIA dependencies + critical-vendor scenarios in the exercise programme. Procurement-layer vendor security lives in TPRM tooling.

Partial
§4 — Controls covered

The BCM-relevant controls BCMStack covers natively

ControlBCMStack surfaceModule
Business Continuity PlanningBCP module — ISO 22301 §8.4.4 nativebcp
Disaster Recovery PlanningBCP module — DR-typed plans + DR-specific exercise capturebcp
Business Impact AnalysisBIA module — configurable matrix + dependencies + RTO/RPObia
Recovery TestingExercise module — ISO 22398 lifecycle + DR-specific failover captureexercises
Crisis Management CommunicationsCrisis module — communications log + stakeholder matrixcrisis
Incident Response ProceduresCrisis module — auto-coded events + action items + reopen supportcrisis
Continual ImprovementImprovement-actions register + reporting trendsreporting
§5 — Overlap

The ECC framework vs ISO 22301

ISO 22301 is a BCM-specific certifiable standard. NCA ECC is a broader cybersecurity framework with a BCM-relevant domain. Both can — and often should — operate together.

ISO 22301:2019

BCM-only · global · certifiable

  • BCM clause structure (§4-§10)
  • Certifiable by accredited bodies
  • Global recognition
  • Deep BCM-specific clause set

NCA ECC

Cybersecurity · KSA · regulator-supervised

  • Broader cybersecurity scope (4 domains)
  • Mandatory for KSA government + CNI
  • BCM is one subdomain (3-1)
  • NCA supervisory enforcement

Practical reality. Most KSA institutions maintain ISO 22301 alignment for the BCM clauses + map evidence into NCA ECC’s Resilience domain. One BCMS, two regulator audiences. BCMStack supports this pattern by tagging controls / evidence with both frameworks.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the ECC framework?

+

The ECC framework — the Saudi National Cybersecurity Authority's Essential Cybersecurity Controls, first issued in 2018 (ECC-1:2018) and now in its second version, ECC-2:2024 — is the baseline cybersecurity framework for KSA government bodies and Critical National Infrastructure (CNI) operators. ECC-2:2024 has four main domains, 28 subdomains, 108 main controls and 92 subcontrols. Compliance is mandatory for in-scope organisations and increasingly cited by SAMA and other Saudi regulators in their own supervisory cycles.

Does BCMStack make us compliant with NCA ECC?

+

Partially. BCMStack covers the Cybersecurity Resilience domain — incident response procedures, business continuity, disaster recovery, recovery testing. We do not cover the Cybersecurity Defense domain (network security, endpoint protection, vulnerability management). Industrial control system controls moved out of ECC in the 2024 version, into NCA's separate Operational Technology Cybersecurity Controls (OTCC). For full NCA ECC compliance you'll need BCMStack alongside dedicated security tooling. We integrate with that tooling rather than replacing it.

Which NCA ECC controls does BCMStack cover natively?

+

Specifically the Cybersecurity Resilience domain controls: business continuity planning, disaster recovery planning, BIA, recovery testing, plus the cyber-incident-response controls that intersect with crisis management. These map cleanly to BCMStack's BCP, BIA, Crisis, and Exercise modules. The platform's audit log + improvement-actions register additionally support the Cybersecurity Governance domain's continual-improvement requirements.

Who must comply with NCA ECC?

+

All Saudi government bodies (ministries, agencies, public-sector entities) and Critical National Infrastructure operators (energy, telco, transport, healthcare, financial services where SAMA supervision overlaps). Some private-sector organisations adopt it voluntarily as a recognised KSA cybersecurity benchmark. NCA performs supervisory reviews; non-compliance flows into NCA's enforcement framework.

How does NCA ECC relate to SAMA's BCM and cybersecurity frameworks?

+

NCA ECC and SAMA's regulatory frameworks are complementary. SAMA-licensed financial institutions still report to SAMA; NCA ECC may apply where the institution also qualifies as Critical National Infrastructure. The Cybersecurity Resilience domain of NCA ECC overlaps significantly with SAMA's BCM Framework — many institutions operate one BCMS and map evidence to both supervisors.

The ECC series

Go deeper on ECC resilience

This page covers what BCMStack does. These cover what the framework asks for — written for practitioners, no product pitch.

See NCA ECC Resilience-domain coverage

We’ll walk you through BCMStack mapped to the Cybersecurity Resilience domain controls and discuss how to integrate with your existing security stack for the other domains.

Book a 20-minute demo

Also see SAMA BCM Framework, ISO 22301:2019, or Qatar NIA.